ON
← Back to feed
A new book on Indian laws demystifies the ‘right to privacy’ and examines how it has improved lives
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

A new book on Indian laws demystifies the ‘right to privacy’ and examines how it has improved lives

A new book explores the evolution of the 'right to privacy' in Indian law, focusing on the landmark 2017 Supreme Court judgment in Justice KS Puttaswamy v Union of India. The ruling affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing its role in protecting individual dignity and enabling the exercise of other freedoms. The judgment overturned the controversial ADM Jabalpur decision from 1975, which had suspended civil liberties during emergencies. The Puttaswamy verdict reshaped India's legal landscape, requiring the government to justify intrusions on privacy through proportionality. Its impact was evident in the subsequent 2018 Aadhaar case, where the court upheld the Aadhaar Act's constitutionality but removed provisions allowing private entities to demand Aadhaar numbers, reinforcing the principle that fundamental rights cannot be outsourced to corporations.

Advertisement

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 9012 days ago
A new book on Indian laws demystifies the ‘right to privacy’ and examines how it has improved lives

A new book explores the evolution of the 'right to privacy' in Indian law, focusing on the landmark 2017 Supreme Court judgment in Justice KS Puttaswamy v Union of India. The ruling affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing its role in protecting individual dignity and enabling the exercise of other freedoms. The judgment overturned the controversial ADM Jabalpur decision from 1975, which had suspended civil liberties during emergencies. The Puttaswamy verdict reshaped India's legal landscape, requiring the government to justify intrusions on privacy through proportionality. Its impact was evident in the subsequent 2018 Aadhaar case, where the court upheld the Aadhaar Act's constitutionality but removed provisions allowing private entities to demand Aadhaar numbers, reinforcing the principle that fundamental rights cannot be outsourced to corporations.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the legal developments surrounding the right to privacy in India, quoting multiple justices and detailing the implications of the Supreme Court's rulings. There is no overt ideological framing or biased language; the focus is on the legal reasoning and its

Why factuality (85): The article accurately summarizes the content of the Puttaswamy judgment, citing multiple justices' perspectives and the unanimous conclusion. It reflects the cross-source consensus regarding the recognition of privacy as a fundamental right. However, it does not provide direct quotes from the origi

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, summarizing the arguments of different justices without taking sides or expressing personal opinions. It maintains a balanced perspective throughout, focusing on the legal reasoning and societal impact.

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenter10 days ago
UPSC Prelims 2027 Polity Quiz (Week 179): MCQs on right to vote, enforcement of decrees and orders of the Supreme Court and more

The article discusses a multiple-choice question related to the enforcement of decrees and orders of the Supreme Court of India under Article 142 of the Constitution. It presents three statements regarding the enforceability of these decrees across India, the court's authority to secure attendance and evidence, and the role of Parliament or the President in prescribing enforcement methods. The explanation clarifies that statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect because the enforcement method is determined by Parliament or the President, not the Chief Justice of India. The relevance of this topic for the UPSC Preliminary Examination is highlighted, as it relates to understanding the scope of judicial powers under the Indian Constitution.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on constitutional law and the powers of the Supreme Court, which is a politically charged subject. However, the content is primarily educational, aimed at preparing candidates for the UPSC examination. It presents factual information about legal provisions without overtly favorit

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories