ON
← Back to feed
A’ Court overturns Oyo court judgment permitting Hijab at UI International school
NG🏛️ Politics9 hr. ago

A’ Court overturns Oyo court judgment permitting Hijab at UI International school

The Court of Appeal in Ibadan overturned a 2022 ruling by the Oyo State High Court that allowed Muslim students at the International School, University of Ibadan (ISI), to wear hijab as part of their school uniform. The appellate court, in a 2-1 decision, determined that the Supreme Court’s precedent allowing hijab in public schools does not apply to private institutions like ISI. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Biobele Georgewill, argued that students had waived their right to wear hijab by agreeing to follow the school’s dress code policies. Justice Fadawu Umar dissented, stating the appeal lacked merit. The case originated in 2018 when Muslim students challenged the school’s hijab ban, and the high court initially ruled in their favor in 2022.

1 reports

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentRightFactual 85Objective 709 hr. ago
A’ Court overturns Oyo court judgment permitting Hijab at UI International school

The Court of Appeal in Ibadan overturned a 2022 ruling by the Oyo State High Court that allowed Muslim students at the International School, University of Ibadan (ISI), to wear hijab as part of their school uniform. The appellate court, in a 2-1 decision, determined that the Supreme Court’s precedent allowing hijab in public schools does not apply to private institutions like ISI. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Biobele Georgewill, argued that students had waived their right to wear hijab by agreeing to follow the school’s dress code policies. Justice Fadawu Umar dissented, stating the appeal lacked merit. The case originated in 2018 when Muslim students challenged the school’s hijab ban, and the high court initially ruled in their favor in 2022.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the issue through the lens of institutional authority and individual rights, emphasizing the school’s autonomy and the waiver of religious rights by students. The language supports the school’s position, suggesting that religious practices should not override institutional rules,傾

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the court's decision and provides details about the case, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is lower due to the use of emotionally charged terms like 'overturned' and potential bias towards the court's ruling, though it does presen

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories