ON
← Back to feed
"People I Flew with All the Time": Flight Attendant Union Head Sara Nelson Remembers 9/11 Victims
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/8/2026

"People I Flew with All the Time": Flight Attendant Union Head Sara Nelson Remembers 9/11 Victims

Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, reflects on her experience during the September 11, 2001 attacks. On that day, she was in Chicago coordinating union activities and receiving updates from United Airlines. She recalls that Flight 175, which she had flown just days prior, struck the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Nelson remembers the victims of that flight, including several colleagues she knew personally. She highlights the critical role of information shared by flight attendants on Flight 175, which helped alert the crew of Flight 93, which was later taken over by hijackers planning to attack U.S. government targets. Nelson emphasizes the bravery of the female flight attendants on Flight 93 who worked with passengers to thwart the attack.

September 11, 2001, fundamentally altered the United States, reshaping national security policies, international relations, and domestic governance. Twenty-five years later, questions remain about whether these changes can be reversed. Former Carter White House speechwriter James Fallows reflects on the enduring impact of the day, noting that while some shifts were intended to prevent future attacks, many have persisted beyond their original purpose. Before 9/11, the U.S. lacked key post-attack institutions such as the Department of Homeland Security, the Transportation Security Administration, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. These agencies were created in response to the need for enhanced security measures. Similarly, the Patriot Act expanded government surveillance powers, marking a significant shift toward a more intrusive federal presence. Local law enforcement also saw dramatic changes, with officers equipped for combat scenarios previously unseen in American policing. The aftermath of 9/11 also led to military interventions abroad, including the invasion of Iraq, which was justified under the guise of combating terrorism. This conflict, however, resulted in prolonged conflicts often referred to as “forever wars.” Such actions, though initially framed as necessary, have had lasting geopolitical consequences. Falls notes that while the nation successfully avoided another large-scale attack, the cultural and institutional changes have been profound. The initial unity following the tragedy gave way to political polarization and diminished public discourse on the long-term implications of these transformations. Privacy advocates have raised concerns over the expansion of surveillance technologies, such as Flock Safety’s automated license plate readers, which collect vast amounts of location data. These tools, once unthinkable, now represent a new normal in American life. While historical moments like 9/11 have shaped the nation’s trajectory, Falls suggests that future generations may one day seek to reverse some of these changes. The challenge lies in balancing security with civil liberties, ensuring that the lessons of 9/11 serve not as a permanent blueprint, but as a cautionary tale.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (7)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Foreign Policy logoForeign PolicyIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 809/7/2026
25 Years After 9/11, What Are We Failing to Imagine Now?

The article discusses the concept of 'failure of imagination' regarding U.S. counterterrorism efforts since 9/11, highlighting historical precedents such as airline hijackings and warnings from experts like Brian Michael Jenkins. It notes that while the U.S. has improved airport security, new threats involving technology, such as drones and artificial intelligence, continue to emerge. The piece references past incidents and scholarly warnings to suggest that current approaches may still lack foresight in addressing evolving terrorist tactics.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of historical failures in counterterrorism planning and current challenges without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It cites both past warnings and present-day concerns without taking a clear partisan stance.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately references Brian Michael Jenkins’ 1989 warning about terrorists using planes as weapons, citing his speech at an Israeli conference. It provides specific quotes and contextualizes them within the broader history of airline hijackings. However, it does not cite the exact docume

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting historical facts and quoting Jenkins without overt bias. However, it repeats the phrase 'failure of imagination' twice, which could be seen as emphasizing a particular interpretation of the 9/11 Commission’s findings.

Democracy Now! logoDemocracy Now!IndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 909/8/2026
"People I Flew with All the Time": Flight Attendant Union Head Sara Nelson Remembers 9/11 Victims

Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, reflects on her experience during the September 11, 2001 attacks. On that day, she was in Chicago coordinating union activities and receiving updates from United Airlines. She recalls that Flight 175, which she had flown just days prior, struck the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Nelson remembers the victims of that flight, including several colleagues she knew personally. She highlights the critical role of information shared by flight attendants on Flight 175, which helped alert the crew of Flight 93, which was later taken over by hijackers planning to attack U.S. government targets. Nelson emphasizes the bravery of the female flight attendants on Flight 93 who worked with passengers to thwart the attack.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the 9/11 attacks through the personal narrative of a labor leader and highlights the heroic actions of flight attendants, particularly emphasizing the gender composition of the crew on Flight 93. While the event itself is historical, the focus on the workers' roles and the broader

Why factuality (30): The article focuses on personal recollections of Sara Nelson and does not address the 1989 document or Brian Michael Jenkins’ work at all. It contains no factual claims related to the primary source material and lacks any reference to the topic of airline security or Jenkins’ warnings.

Why objectivity (90): The article presents a personal account with minimal editorializing. It is highly objective in tone, focusing on the speaker’s experience and emotions without taking a stance on broader issues like aviation security or terrorism.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories