ON
← Back to feed
88-Year-Old Widow with No Computer 'Gave' Democrats $150K, Records Show
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative8 days ago

88-Year-Old Widow with No Computer 'Gave' Democrats $150K, Records Show

An 88-year-old Michigan widow, Elizabeth Waffle, claims that federal records attribute over $150,000 in ActBlue donations to her name over five years, which she denies having contributed. The FEC filings show numerous small donations under her name, including contributions to Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, whom his campaign claims is a top ActBlue fundraiser. Waffle, who lives on a modest pension and lacks a computer, finds the volume of donations implausible. Commenters on X questioned the legitimacy of these donations, suggesting they might be fraudulent. This follows similar reports from early 2025 where elderly Democrats alleged unauthorized donations were recorded in their names. Congressional Republicans, including Rep. Jim Jordan, have previously criticized ActBlue for withholding information about foreign-linked contributions.

An 88-year-old Michigan widow, Elizabeth Waffle, claims that federal records attribute over $150,000 in ActBlue donations to her name over five years, despite her stating she does not have the means to contribute such an amount. Waffle, who lives in a trailer in Milan, Michigan, told Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Charlie LeDuff that the numerous small contributions listed in federal filings do not reflect actual donations she made. The records show 14,696 separate donations, approximately eight per day, averaging around $9.18 each. Waffle, living on a modest pension, said the total was impossible. Waffle explained that she does not own a computer and has spotty internet access, making it unlikely she could have made so many frequent donations. She pointed out that some of the donations were made from a trailer she recently moved into and from an apartment she briefly rented in town. Some entries even list contributions to out-of-state candidates she said she has never heard of. “This is very abnormal,” she said, reviewing the records. “I think it’s wrong, and I think there’s something in there that’s off.” Among the disputed donations are 47 to Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic Socialist running in Michigan’s August 4 Senate primary. El-Sayed’s campaign has claimed he is the state’s top ActBlue fundraiser, raising ten times the small-dollar money compared to Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI). A recent Detroit News/WDIV poll placed Stevens ahead by about seven points. Commenters on social media platforms noted the discrepancy, with one suggesting the platform might have incorrectly assigned hundreds of thousands of dollars to elderly donors who likely did not contribute the funds. Another user asked, “Where is this money really coming from?” and called for an investigation. The situation echoes similar reports from earlier this year, when elderly Democrats claimed thousands of donations had been logged in their names without their knowledge. At the time, Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI) stated he had shared the committee’s findings with several state attorneys general and remained open to working with state law enforcement. The issue has gained attention amid broader scrutiny of ActBlue, which is under investigation for alleged illegal foreign donations. ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising platform, faces ongoing scrutiny from the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. This follows a New York Times report that revealed the organization's external legal team warned it may not have followed proper protocols to prevent fraudulent campaign donations from foreigners. The report also indicated that ActBlue may have misled Congress about these matters. ActBlue has asserted attorney-client privilege over the requested documents, including former interim general counsel Aaron Ting’s resignation letter and an internal memo alleging retaliation for exposing internal misconduct. ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones testified before the House Administration Committee on June 10 but declined to answer questions, invoking her Fifth Amendment rights. Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Bryan Steil (R-WI), and James Comer (R-KY) subsequently threatened the platform with contempt over withheld documents. The Washington Times attempted to reach ActBlue for comment but received no response. Meanwhile, Waffle continues to question the legitimacy of the donations attributed to her name, expressing concern over the accuracy of the records and the potential implications of the discrepancies.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 608 days ago
88-Year-Old Widow with No Computer 'Gave' Democrats $150K, Records Show

An 88-year-old Michigan widow, Elizabeth Waffle, claims that federal records attribute over $150,000 in ActBlue donations to her name over five years, which she denies having contributed. The FEC filings show numerous small donations under her name, including contributions to Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, whom his campaign claims is a top ActBlue fundraiser. Waffle, who lives on a modest pension and lacks a computer, finds the volume of donations implausible. Commenters on X questioned the legitimacy of these donations, suggesting they might be fraudulent. This follows similar reports from early 2025 where elderly Democrats alleged unauthorized donations were recorded in their names. Congressional Republicans, including Rep. Jim Jordan, have previously criticized ActBlue for withholding information about foreign-linked contributions.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a potential fraud involving ActBlue donations, highlighting concerns raised by conservative lawmakers like Rep. Jim Jordan and Rep. Bryan Steil. It emphasizes the discrepancy between the donor's financial reality and the reported donations, implying systemic issues in

Why factuality (80): This article discusses a completely unrelated story about a donation discrepancy involving Elizabeth Waffle. It is not about Whitmer's endorsement of Stevens and thus cannot be evaluated in relation to the primary source document.

Why objectivity (60): The article is highly biased, using emotionally charged language such as 'baffled' and 'hell no.' It frames the situation as suspicious and potentially fraudulent without providing evidence or balanced perspective.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 559 days ago
Michigan woman baffled to learn she donated over $150,000 to ActBlue and Democrats

An 88-year-old Michigan woman, Elizabeth Waffle, discovered through Federal Election Commission records that over $150,000 in donations were made in her name to Democratic fundraising group ActBlue and various Democratic candidates since 2020. Waffle, who lives in a rural trailer, claims she does not have access to computers or reliable internet and doubts she could have made such frequent donations. The FEC documents show numerous small contributions, including 21 on May 30 and 18 on May 31 alone. ActBlue is currently under investigation by the House Oversight Committee for potential violations related to foreign donations, with the organization invoking attorney-client privilege. ActBlue's CEO declined to testify directly, citing Fifth Amendment protections.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses allegations against ActBlue and mentions Democratic figures, it presents both the controversy surrounding ActBlue and the woman's confusion over the donations without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. The framing remains balanced between the investigation into

Why factuality (75): This article discusses a completely unrelated story about a donation discrepancy involving Elizabeth Waffle. It is not about Whitmer's endorsement of Stevens and thus cannot be evaluated in relation to the primary source document.

Why objectivity (55): The article is biased, emphasizing the potential fraud aspect without providing balanced reporting. It uses emotive language and focuses on the controversy rather than presenting a neutral account.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories