ON
← Back to feed
‘Completely unacceptable’: UK slams Netanyahu for ‘Islamic republic’ comment
IL🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative7 days ago

‘Completely unacceptable’: UK slams Netanyahu for ‘Islamic republic’ comment

British officials condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after he referred to the United Kingdom as an 'Islamic republic' during a podcast interview. The UK criticized the remark as 'completely unacceptable' and informed the Israeli government of its concerns. Netanyahu made the comment while discussing historical ties between Britain and Israel, referencing Winston Churchill's descendants who reported positively on the 1967 Six-Day War. He suggested that Britain could become the first 'Islamic republic' with nuclear weapons, implying a threat from the UK. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer claimed Netanyahu was quoting U.S. Vice President JD Vance, who had previously made similar remarks about the UK. Vance, now part of the Trump administration, has expressed skepticism toward Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has altered the internal rules of his Likud party to allow a far-right politician to run in the upcoming primary elections, a move that has drawn attention amid heightened tensions within the ruling party and broader geopolitical disputes. The change comes as Netanyahu faces mounting challenges from within his own ranks, particularly from Economy Minister Nir Barkat, who has openly criticized the prime minister’s handling of the ongoing conflict with Hamas and his domestic policies. The shift in Likud’s internal regulations was confirmed through multiple sources, indicating that Netanyahu is attempting to consolidate his position ahead of the October 27 general election. This move allows a candidate who aligns more closely with hardline positions to enter the race, potentially reshaping the dynamics of the party’s leadership contest. The decision reflects Netanyahu’s efforts to maintain control over the Likud faction, even as dissent grows among senior members of his government. The controversy over Netanyahu’s remarks about Britain has also intensified scrutiny on his leadership style and foreign policy approach. During an Army Radio podcast recorded in August 2026, Netanyahu referred to Britain as the “Islamic Republic of Britain,” a phrase that drew immediate condemnation from the UK government. A British government spokesman described the comments as “completely unacceptable” and stated that the issue had been raised with the Israeli authorities. The remark followed a discussion about the legacy of fallen soldiers and the historical ties between Israel and the United Kingdom, particularly referencing the pro-Israel coverage of the Six-Day War by descendants of Winston Churchill. Netanyahu’s comments were initially attributed to a previous statement made by US Vice President JD Vance during a speech in July 2024. However, the Israeli government later attempted to deflect responsibility, suggesting that Netanyahu was merely repeating a remark made by Vance. This explanation did little to ease concerns among international observers and critics, who viewed the comment as an inflammatory and diplomatically damaging statement. The situation escalated further when Likud launched a controversial billboard campaign ahead of the election season. The advertisement featured images of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem, all positioned together with the message “They want Netanyahu to lose; don’t let them win.” The billboard, which was erected in Tel Aviv, sparked a wave of responses from rival political factions, who created their own variations to criticize Netanyahu’s allies and advisors. Among these responses, the Yashar party, led by former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, countered with a version of the billboard that accused Netanyahu of undermining the military. Other political figures, including Member of Knesset Naama Lazimi, modified the billboard to highlight alleged scandals involving Netanyahu’s inner circle, specifically linking them to the Qatargate affair. These developments underscore the deepening divisions within Israeli politics, as competing factions seek to influence public perception ahead of the upcoming elections. Meanwhile, the internal struggle within Likud has reached a critical juncture with the looming primary elections. Netanyahu’s potential confrontation with Barkat has become a focal point of speculation, with analysts predicting a high-stakes battle for the leadership of the party. Barkat, who has long been a vocal critic of Netanyahu, has been preparing for this moment, leveraging his financial resources and political connections to challenge the prime minister’s dominance. Internal polling suggests that Barkat enjoys strong support among certain segments of the Likud base, although Netanyahu still holds a significant advantage in terms of name recognition and political experience. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the outcome of the Likud primary will have far-reaching implications for Israel’s future direction. Whether Netanyahu succeeds in maintaining his grip on power or faces a formidable challenge from within his own party remains uncertain, but the stage is set for a pivotal showdown that could reshape the nation’s political trajectory.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 759 days ago
Netanyahu calls UK an ‘Islamic republic,’ jokes it would be first one with nukes

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu referred to the United Kingdom as an 'Islamic republic' during an interview with an Army Radio podcast. He made the remark while discussing the legacy of Winston Churchill and the pro-Israel reportage by Churchill's descendants during the 1967 Six-Day War. Netanyahu suggested that Britain could become the first Islamic republic with nuclear weapons, a statement echoing a similar comment made by U.S. Vice President JD Vance in 2024. The podcast episode was reportedly recorded at the studio of NVP, a production company linked to Netanyahu's Likud party, rather than at Army Radio's usual location. This raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the recording, though Army Radio stated that no formal request had been made for the change.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Netanyahu's remarks in a manner that aligns with right-leaning rhetoric, particularly through the comparison to JD Vance's comments and the emphasis on anti-Islamist sentiment. The framing highlights the perceived threat of Islamism in Western countries, which is a common theme in

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports Netanyahu's remarks about Britain being an 'Islamic republic' and the subsequent UK response. It cites sources and provides context about where the interview took place. However, it lacks direct connection to the primary source material about Barkat and Netanyahu's int

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the event objectively, quoting Netanyahu and the UK government's response without overt bias. However, it briefly implies criticism of Netanyahu's comments through the inclusion of Piers Morgan's reaction, slightly affecting neutrality.

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 658 days ago
‘Completely unacceptable’: UK slams Netanyahu for ‘Islamic republic’ comment

British officials condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after he referred to the United Kingdom as an 'Islamic republic' during a podcast interview. The UK criticized the remark as 'completely unacceptable' and informed the Israeli government of its concerns. Netanyahu made the comment while discussing historical ties between Britain and Israel, referencing Winston Churchill's descendants who reported positively on the 1967 Six-Day War. He suggested that Britain could become the first 'Islamic republic' with nuclear weapons, implying a threat from the UK. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer claimed Netanyahu was quoting U.S. Vice President JD Vance, who had previously made similar remarks about the UK. Vance, now part of the Trump administration, has expressed skepticism toward Israel.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Netanyahu's controversial remarks as an unfounded accusation against the UK, suggesting it reflects a broader ideological tension. While the UK's criticism is presented neutrally, the emphasis on Netanyahu's provocative statement and the implication that such rhetoric is 'unaccept

Why factuality (75): The article accurately summarizes Netanyahu's comments and the UK's response. It provides background on the context of the interview and quotes relevant figures. However, it adds some interpretive elements, such as mentioning Piers Morgan's reaction, which introduces a slight bias.

Why objectivity (65): While the article attempts to remain neutral, it includes subjective interpretations of Netanyahu's intent and quotes Piers Morgan's opinion, which may influence reader perception. The overall tone remains mostly objective but shows minor leaning.

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 707 days ago
What Netanyahu’s ‘Islamic Republic of Britain’ remark reveals - analysis

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a controversial remark during a personal conversation with Avi Harush, a grieving father whose son died in Gaza, referring to Britain as the 'Islamic Republic of Britain.' The comment was widely criticized, with a British government spokesman calling it 'completely unacceptable' and British media figure Piers Morgan labeling Netanyahu an 'idiot.' The discussion, which focused on grief and legacy, included Netanyahu reflecting on naming children after fallen soldiers and recalling his meeting with the grandson of Winston Churchill, whom he described as a 'very nice man' supportive of Israel. The remark sparked significant backlash, highlighting tensions between Israeli leaders and British public opinion.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Netanyahu's remark as a politically charged statement that reflects a broader ideological tension. The emphasis on the negative reaction from British authorities and media figures, particularly those with a critical stance towards Israel, suggests a right-leaning framing. The tone

Why factuality (65): The article accurately describes the Likud billboard and its content, aligning with external reports. However, it doesn't directly tie this to the primary source about Barkat and Netanyahu's internal conflict, reducing its relevance to the central topic.

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the billboard content factually without overt bias. It includes responses from other political groups, maintaining a balanced perspective on the political advertising landscape.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories