7.8 kilometres in 28 minutes: a driver in Ljubljana loses 67 hours a year because of horses

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 85Oct 15

Anton Rop, a candidate for mayor of the City of Ljubljana, has begun his election campaign by emphasizing the need for fundamental changes in the city. He pledged to focus on making housing and healthcare more accessible to residents. His platform highlights addressing issues related to affordability and accessibility in these critical areas, which he believes are essential for improving the quality of life in Ljubljana.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Rop's campaign promises without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It focuses on his stated goals for housing and healthcare access, which are common concerns across the political spectrum. The framing remains neutral, presenting his positions without evaluative

Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes Anton Rop's campaign promises regarding housing, transportation, and healthcare. It cites direct statements from Rop and his party, providing a clear picture of his platform. The content aligns closely with the cross-source consensus on the political landscape in Lj

Why objectivity (85): The article presents Rop's policies and statements objectively, without overt bias. It focuses on his policy proposals and campaign strategy, maintaining a neutral tone throughout. There is no indication of favoritism or editorializing.

Ljubljanske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75Oct 20

The article discusses the upcoming mayoral election in Ljubljana, focusing on Zoran Janković, who has led the city for twenty years, facing challenges from candidates primarily aligned with the left. Key contenders include Luka Mesec from the Left Party and others from various smaller parties. Public opinion polls indicate Janković leads with 34.6% support, followed by Mesec with 21%. The article explores whether these left-wing challengers aim to consolidate their votes against Janković or genuinely seek to replace him as mayor. Analysts note the complexity within the left bloc, with some candidates highlighting issues like housing, water supply, and traffic policies to attract voters seeking change after two decades of Janković's leadership.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the mayoral race, including poll results and candidate positions, without overtly favoring any side. It includes balanced perspectives from analysts and does not use biased language or selectively omit context.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the current state of the mayoral race in Ljubljana, including the names of competing candidates and the potential impact of left-wing challenges to Zoran Janković. It cites a public opinion survey (Vox populi) and aligns with other articles about the competitive nat

Why objectivity (75): While the article attempts to remain objective, it leans slightly toward emphasizing the significance of left-wing competition against Janković, potentially giving more weight to this aspect than others. This subtle framing might influence the reader's perception of the election dynamics.

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70Oct 16

The article discusses traffic congestion in Ljubljana, highlighting how drivers lose significant amounts of time during peak hours due to inefficient traffic signals and heavy vehicle flow. Using data from the TomTom Traffic Index, it states that drivers in Ljubljana lost approximately 67 hours in traffic jams in 2025 alone, equivalent to over eight workdays. The article attributes this problem to the high volume of vehicles entering the city daily, around 120,000 cars, and the lack of adaptive traffic signal systems. It also notes a decline in public transportation usage compared to car travel, despite efforts by the City of Ljubljana to promote sustainable mobility. The piece explores potential solutions such as smart intersections and highlights the cost of implementing these improvements, using an example project in Šmarje pri Jelšah.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on traffic congestion in Ljubljana without overtly favoring any political stance. While it critiques the inefficiency of current infrastructure and mentions the need for modernization, it does not assign blame to specific political actors or parties. The tone is non

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific data such as '67 hours lost per year' and references the TomTom Traffic Index, which lends credibility. However, it lacks direct citations from official sources or studies, relying mostly on anonymous traffic data. The claim that Ljubljana should not be comfortable with

Why objectivity (70): The tone is critical of Ljubljana’s traffic situation, using phrases like 'not something we should be comfortable with' and 'should not accept.' While it presents facts, it frames them in a way that emphasizes the problem more than offering balanced perspectives on potential solutions or efforts bei

Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90Oct 24

Maribor24 has launched a 'Digital Mayoral League' where candidates for the mayor of Maribor compete across ten thematic rounds to present their policies on key urban development issues. The format involves five pairs of candidates per round answering identical questions, with readers voting via online polls to determine winners based on a point system. The first round focuses specifically on traffic infrastructure and mobility within the city. Candidate Andrej Bauman proposes revising speed zones, building a central garage house, implementing smart signage, and constructing a tunnel under the city center to alleviate congestion. Candidate Bor Greiner suggests replacing traffic lights with roundabouts, removing unnecessary radars, and building a covered overpass with integrated parking facilities to address daily traffic jams.

Bias read (Center): The article functions as a neutral platform for presenting competing political views during an election campaign. It introduces the rules of the competition objectively and presents the specific proposals of two candidates regarding local infrastructure without using loaded language, editorializing,

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The writing style is neutral and descriptive. It sets up the premise of the competition without taking sides. The inclusion of the candidate's quote allows the reader to see his perspective without the editor adding judgment or emotional language. The framing is balanced, presenting the initiative a

Ljubljanske noviceIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 40Oct 24

This opinion piece proposes renaming Ljubljana’s central 'Novi trg' (New Square) to 'Trg slovenskih znanstvenikov' (Square of Slovenian Scientists) to honor local scientific achievements. The authors argue that the current name lacks historical significance compared to previous iterations like Auerspergplatz or Marxov trg, which reflected specific political eras. They suggest transforming the square into a 'smart square' featuring interactive augmented reality displays and AI-driven light projections to promote science and artificial intelligence. The proposal emphasizes using technology as a creative tool rather than engaging in traditional political debates over naming conventions. The text frames this initiative as a modern civic idea generated through a synergy between editorial vision and analytical technology.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a specific municipal proposal involving public space and cultural policy, which falls under politics due to its impact on public infrastructure and civic identity. However, the tone is constructive and forward-looking, focusing on technological integration and educational value.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (40): The tone is highly subjective and promotional. Phrases like 'synergy of editorial vision,' 'analytical power of modern technology,' and 'without political maneuvering' show clear self-promotion and advocacy for the proposed renaming. It reads more like a blog post or op-ed than a neutral news report