40,000 signatures have been collected, and a referendum is expected in the fall.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago

A group has collected 42,004 signatures to initiate a referendum against a proposed law expanding parliamentary investigations. The referendum, titled 'against political police,' aims to prevent politicians from bypassing judicial oversight to launch investigations at will. The proposal would allow investigative committees to access private communications, SMS messages, phone calls, bank accounts, and personal data of individuals unrelated to politics, including their family members and friends. Supporters argue this law could grant unchecked power to authorities to intrude into citizens' private lives, while opponents claim it protects against abuse of power. The initiative was backed by NGOs, civil society groups, activists, and unions, despite challenges like technical issues and summer heat. The referendum is expected to take place in the fall.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate without overtly favoring one perspective. It outlines the concerns raised by supporters regarding potential abuse of power and the risks to privacy, but does not explicitly criticize or endorse either side. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Consistent with other sources, reporting the same number of signatures and the intent behind the referendum. Maintains a neutral tone, though uses phrases like 'proti politični policiji' which may carry some emotional weight.

MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 0Objective 04 days ago

An article reports that 42,040 signatures have been collected to initiate a constitutional referendum against parliamentary investigations, which critics argue could grant politicians unchecked power over private lives. The initiative, led by former members of the Human Rights Protection Committee, claims the proposed law would allow parliamentary inquiry commissions to access personal communications, banking records, and data of individuals unrelated to politics, including their family members. Supporters frame the issue as a defense of fundamental rights against potential abuse of state power, calling the law 'dangerous' and advocating for public oversight of governance.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as a threat to privacy and democratic accountability, using emotionally charged language such as 'dangerous law,' 'unchecked power,' and 'abuse of state power.' It emphasizes the need to protect individual rights against governmental overreach, aligning with left-

Why these scores (Factual 0 · Objective 0): This article shifts focus to an unrelated issue involving intervention laws and economic concerns, not the referendum. No relevant information provided.