ON
← Back to feed
2016 arson case: SC to hear Surendra Gadling's bail plea on Oct 14
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 hr. ago

2016 arson case: SC to hear Surendra Gadling's bail plea on Oct 14

The Supreme Court of India has scheduled a hearing for October 14 on a bail plea filed by advocate Surendra Gadling in the 2016 Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case. Gadling, who is also an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, challenges a 2023 Bombay High Court order denying his bail. The case involves allegations that Gadling provided aid to Maoist rebels, shared sensitive information, and conspired to oppose the operation of the mines. He has been in custody for over seven years and is accused of instigating local residents to join the Maoist movement. The court previously recused one judge from the case, and the Maharashtra government has indicated the matter can be heard on a non-miscellaneous day.

1 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenter11 hr. ago
2016 arson case: SC to hear Surendra Gadling's bail plea on Oct 14

The Supreme Court of India has scheduled a hearing for October 14 on a bail plea filed by advocate Surendra Gadling in the 2016 Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case. Gadling, who is also an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, challenges a 2023 Bombay High Court order denying his bail. The case involves allegations that Gadling provided aid to Maoist rebels, shared sensitive information, and conspired to oppose the operation of the mines. He has been in custody for over seven years and is accused of instigating local residents to join the Maoist movement. The court previously recused one judge from the case, and the Maharashtra government has indicated the matter can be heard on a non-miscellaneous day.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and facts surrounding Gadling's bail plea without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the charges against Gadling, including his alleged ties to Maoist rebels and involvement in the Elgar Parishad case, but does not take a clear stance on the

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories