ON
← Back to feed
Shas leader Arye Deri claims IDF prefers secular army, haredi soldiers are 'a big headache'
IL🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives9/3/2026

Shas leader Arye Deri claims IDF prefers secular army, haredi soldiers are 'a big headache'

Shas leader Arye Deri claimed during a podcast interview that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) prefer a secular army and view haredi (ultra-Orthodox) soldiers as a 'big headache.' He stated that the IDF does not want haredi recruits and suggested that the army should handle their enlistment without his intervention. Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, leader of the Together party, criticized Deri's remarks, calling him 'harming IDF soldiers' and accusing him of lying and making excuses. Bennett also accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of spreading 'blood libels' against IDF commanders, referencing Netanyahu's claim that the IDF avoided waking him on the morning of the October 7 Hamas attacks, which he alleged could have changed the outcome.

At least 16 soldiers from the Givati Brigade’s Rotem Battalion were sent to military prison after refusing to enter an armored personnel carrier in Gaza with a female paramedic during an operation. The soldiers claimed the cramped conditions within the Namer vehicle violated the IDF’s Joint Service Order and agreements with religious-Zionist yeshivot. The mission was ultimately canceled due to the refusal, and the soldiers faced disciplinary action. Five of them received 10-day sentences, while 11 others were given five-day sentences. Two of the soldiers who led the disobedience will undergo a review process before being allowed back into combat roles. The incident occurred during an operation in Gaza, where the soldiers were part of a larger military task. The refusal to enter the APC stemmed from religious concerns regarding men and women being in close proximity in confined spaces. The soldiers, who are not ultra-Orthodox but belong to the hesder yeshiva system, cited halachic reasons for their stance. Initially, they attempted to contact their brigade’s rabbi, but no response was received. They then sought guidance from rabbis affiliated with their hesder yeshivot, who advised against entering the vehicle under these conditions. Despite this, the brigade rabbi later ruled that the mission was permissible due to its operational significance and limited duration. However, the soldiers continued to refuse, leading to the cancellation of the mission and subsequent punishment. The IDF has long recognized the need to balance religious accommodations with operational requirements. The Joint Service Order allows religious soldiers to serve in gender-segregated frameworks during operational activities, except in exceptional circumstances. This policy reflects the army’s acknowledgment that religious observance is integral to the identity of many soldiers, particularly those from religious-Zionist backgrounds. Nevertheless, the recent incident highlights tensions between individual religious convictions and the broader imperative of maintaining unity and effectiveness in the field. Commanders are tasked with ensuring that operational missions proceed smoothly while respecting the religious sensitivities of their troops. In this case, the battalion commander determined that the soldiers' actions constituted disobedience and imposed penalties accordingly. The IDF has emphasized the importance of clear rules and a defined command structure to prevent conflicts arising from divergent interpretations of religious law. The army has also stressed the necessity of resolving such disputes internally, rather than allowing external rabbinical authorities to influence battlefield decisions. The situation underscores the challenges posed by integrating diverse groups within the military. With increasing numbers of religious soldiers joining the ranks, the IDF faces the dual challenge of accommodating religious practices while maintaining operational cohesion. The integration of women into combat roles further complicates this dynamic, requiring careful navigation of gender-related issues. Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir has called for the army to ensure that integration occurs without compromising either side’s interests. The incident also echoes experiences from the October 7 attack, during which religious soldiers demonstrated willingness to serve alongside women in high-stakes scenarios. Female tank crews operated alongside male counterparts, and combat medics, both male and female, treated wounded soldiers under fire. These instances illustrate that religious observance and mixed-gender service can coexist under extreme conditions. Yet, the current case suggests that even in less dire situations, unresolved tensions can lead to operational disruptions and disciplinary consequences.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 758/31/2026
16 Givati soldiers sent to prison for refusing to enter APC with female paramedic

Sixteen Givati Brigade soldiers were imprisoned for refusing to enter an armored personnel carrier (APC) during a mission in Gaza due to the presence of a female paramedic. The refusal led to the cancellation of the operation. The battalion commander sentenced five soldiers to 10 days in military jail, with two facing additional review before returning to combat duties. Eleven others received five-day sentences. The incident highlights ongoing tensions between Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) soldiers and military policies requiring interaction with women, reflecting broader societal debates over religious accommodations in the Israeli Defense Forces.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the soldiers' actions as defiance of military protocol, emphasizing their religious objections and linking the issue to broader societal debates about Haredi service obligations. It presents the military's disciplinary action as justified, aligning with conservative perspectives.

Why factuality (90): This article provides specific details about the disciplinary action taken against 16 soldiers, including the number of days in prison and the process for returning to combat duty. It accurately reports the incident and aligns with the information from other sources, maintaining consistency with the

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents facts objectively, it does include some subjective phrasing like 'latest in a series of cases,' which frames the incident within a broader narrative. However, it remains relatively neutral compared to the first article.

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 659/3/2026
Shas leader Arye Deri claims IDF prefers secular army, haredi soldiers are 'a big headache'

Shas leader Arye Deri claimed during a podcast interview that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) prefer a secular army and view haredi (ultra-Orthodox) soldiers as a 'big headache.' He stated that the IDF does not want haredi recruits and suggested that the army should handle their enlistment without his intervention. Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, leader of the Together party, criticized Deri's remarks, calling him 'harming IDF soldiers' and accusing him of lying and making excuses. Bennett also accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of spreading 'blood libels' against IDF commanders, referencing Netanyahu's claim that the IDF avoided waking him on the morning of the October 7 Hamas attacks, which he alleged could have changed the outcome.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Deri's comments as misleading and harmful to the IDF, aligning with right-wing criticism of haredi influence in military service. Bennett's strong condemnation of Deri and Netanyahu's alleged smear campaign against IDF commanders reflects a right-leaning perspective that prioritiz

Why factuality (85): The article reports Deri's claim that the IDF prefers a secular army and finds haredi soldiers problematic, as well as Bennett's response. These statements are corroborated by multiple sources within the political discourse, indicating a cross-source consensus. However, the article does not provide

Why objectivity (65): The article presents both Deri's comments and Bennett's rebuttal, but frames them in a way that suggests Bennett's criticism is more credible. The language used to describe Deri's remarks as potentially harmful implies a value judgment, while Bennett's statements are presented more objectively. This

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories