ON
← Back to feed
105-year-old murder convict walks free as Supreme Court orders early release
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

105-year-old murder convict walks free as Supreme Court orders early release

India's Supreme Court has released 105-year-old Rasik Chandra Mondal, who was convicted of murdering his brother in 1988 over a property dispute. The court waived his remaining life sentence, citing his advanced age and poor health. Mondal was initially sentenced to life imprisonment in 1994 when he was 74 years old and served time in prison until being granted interim bail in 2024. His appeals against the conviction were rejected by both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court. In 2020, Mondal sought early release based on his age and health, leading to the Supreme Court issuing notices and eventually granting him permanent release. The court emphasized that Mondal would not be returned to custody and could live freely.

The Supreme Court on Friday freed 105-year-old murder convict Rasik Chandra Mondal, waiving his remaining life sentence due to his advanced age and deteriorating health. Born in 1920 in West Bengal’s Malda district, Mondal was convicted in 1994 for the murder of his brother, Suresh Mondal, in 1988, following a property dispute. At the time of sentencing, Mondal was 74 years old and received a life-term prison sentence. He spent nearly 34 years behind bars before being granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in November 2024. The court’s decision followed a prolonged legal battle spanning several decades. After his initial conviction, Mondal appealed to the Calcutta High Court, which upheld the verdict in 2018. His subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected in March 2019. However, in 2020, at the age of 99, Mondal filed a plea seeking premature release, citing his poor health and advancing years. His lawyer, JP Dhanda, informed the Supreme Court that Mondal could barely move and suffered from multiple ailments. During hearings, the court questioned whether Mondal was still alive, to which Dhanda confirmed he was, though in critical condition. In May 2021, the Supreme Court issued notice to the West Bengal government regarding Mondal’s request. The court considered his medical reports and acknowledged the gravity of his situation. In November 2024, it directed his release on interim bail, subject to certain conditions. A bench consisting of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana reviewed the matter again in July 2026. The court gave the state four weeks to provide further information on Mondal’s health and ability to continue litigation. On Friday, the court finalized its ruling, closing the case and waiving any remaining portion of his life sentence. Chief Justice Kant emphasized that Mondal would not be returned to custody, stating, “Even if the life sentence is not over, he will not be taken back in custody.” The court also made the interim bail granted in 2024 absolute and final. This means Mondal will live the remainder of his life outside of prison, under no legal obligation to serve further time. The decision reflects the judiciary’s recognition of the unique circumstances surrounding a defendant who has lived well beyond the typical lifespan of a prisoner. Mondal’s case highlights the intersection of legal principles and human rights considerations. While the law mandates the execution of sentences, courts have increasingly shown willingness to consider compassionate relief in extraordinary cases. Mondal’s legal team argued that his continued detention posed unnecessary risks to his health and dignity. The court’s response underscores a growing trend toward balancing punitive justice with humane treatment, particularly in cases involving elderly individuals. Legal experts suggest that Mondal’s case may set a precedent for similar petitions in the future. As populations age and lifespans extend, courts may face more requests for early release based on age and health. The outcome of such cases often hinges on the specific evidence presented, including medical records and expert testimony. In Mondal’s case, the court relied heavily on the testimonies of his lawyers and the documented health decline over the past decade. As of Friday, Mondal is free to live his remaining days without legal constraints. His family and legal representatives have expressed gratitude for the court’s decision. The case concludes a chapter of legal history marked by persistence, advocacy, and the evolving role of the judiciary in addressing complex human conditions.

2 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 952 days ago
105-year-old murder convict walks free as Supreme Court orders early release

India's Supreme Court has released 105-year-old Rasik Chandra Mondal, who was convicted of murdering his brother in 1988 over a property dispute. The court waived his remaining life sentence, citing his advanced age and poor health. Mondal was initially sentenced to life imprisonment in 1994 when he was 74 years old and served time in prison until being granted interim bail in 2024. His appeals against the conviction were rejected by both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court. In 2020, Mondal sought early release based on his age and health, leading to the Supreme Court issuing notices and eventually granting him permanent release. The court emphasized that Mondal would not be returned to custody and could live freely.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the release of a convicted individual. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal process and the court's reasoning rather

Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the Supreme Court's decision to release Rasik Chandra Mondal based on his age and health, aligning closely with the cross-source consensus. It provides specific details such as the date of the ruling, the names of the judges involved, and the timeline of events includi

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without emotional language or overt bias. It includes direct quotes from the court and provides background information on Mondal's case without suggesting approval or criticism of the court's decision.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 922 days ago
105-year-old murder convict granted relief after Supreme Court closes 1988 case

The Supreme Court of India waived the remaining sentence of Rasik Chandra Mondal, a 105-year-old convicted murderer from West Bengal, due to his extreme age and poor health. Mondal had been serving a life sentence imposed in 1994 for a 1988 murder case. His legal battle spanned decades, with convictions upheld by lower courts and the High Court before reaching the Supreme Court. In 2020, Mondal sought premature release at age 99, citing health issues. After further medical evaluations, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, decided to grant him immediate release, closing the case based on humanitarian grounds.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a judicial decision based on humanitarian considerations rather than political ideology. While the subject involves the justice system and human rights, the framing remains neutral, focusing on legal procedures and medical conditions without overtly favoring

Why factuality (93): The article correctly conveys the Supreme Court's decision to grant early release to Mondal based on his age and health. However, it lacks some specific details present in the first article, such as the exact dates of the court proceedings and the full composition of the bench. The mention of the ad

Why objectivity (92): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the legal process and the court's reasoning. However, the inclusion of the phrase 'weighing humanitarian considerations' introduces a slight interpretive angle, though it does not strongly favor one perspective. The tone remains mostly neutral despi

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories