ON
← Back to feed
100 days without Orbán: How Hungary has changed under Magyars
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

100 days without Orbán: How Hungary has changed under Magyars

The article discusses the changes in Hungary after the unexpected victory of Péter Magyar’s Tisza Party in the April election, marking the end of Viktor Orbán’s 16-year rule. It highlights the disappearance of Orbán’s propaganda, including his warnings about migrants and security threats, which had been pervasive in daily life. The piece quotes a Hungarian citizen who struggled to believe this era has ended. The article notes that despite initial surprise at the election result, public approval for Magyar has remained high, with recent polls showing 67% of respondents believing Hungary is moving in the right direction. However, expectations for Magyar remain high, and the challenge lies in whether he can deliver on promises such as anti-corruption efforts, improved healthcare, and economic improvements. The article also mentions the appointment of a former High Court judge, András Baka, as president, who is an opponent of Orbán but not a loyalist to Magyar.

After 100 days since the fall of Viktor Orbán, Hungary has begun to show signs of transformation. The absence of the former prime minister, once a dominant figure in Hungarian politics, has left a noticeable void in both public discourse and political strategy. In Budapest, the cityscape appears subtly different, once omnipresent propaganda against Orbán’s opponents, including figures such as Manfred Weber, Ursula von der Leyen, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ferenc Gyurcsány, and George Soros, has largely disappeared. This shift marks a tangible change in the nation's political landscape following the historic landslide victory of Péter Magyar’s Tisza Party in April this year. Magyar’s rise came after 16 years of rule under Orbán, during which the latter reshaped justice and the rule of law in favor of his ruling Fidesz party, misused EU funds, and enriched a close circle of allies. His downfall began with a pardon scandal that undermined his credibility and brought forward Magyar, a former Fidesz insider who led a grassroots movement to oust Orbán. Political observers likened the election to the fall of the Iron Curtain, and images of a jubilant capital celebrating the outcome spread globally. Three months have passed since that momentous day. According to recent polls, the initial euphoria has not faded, it has, in some cases, grown stronger. As of early July, 67 percent of respondents surveyed by the Medián research institute expressed belief that Hungary is moving in the right direction. However, expectations remain high, and the challenge lies in whether Magyar can meet them. The Hungarian parliament recently selected András Baka, a former constitutional court judge and Orbán critic, as the new president. While he is not a loyalist to Magyar, his appointment signals a departure from the previous administration’s alignment with Orbán’s inner circle. Political analyst Péter Krekó outlines three key hopes of the population: an end to corruption, prosecution of elites who misused public funds, improvements in healthcare, and economic progress visible in everyday life. These demands require time and resources, yet Magyar has already taken steps toward addressing them. With a two-thirds majority in Parliament, he initiated reforms, including removing Orbán-aligned President Tamás Sulyok through a constitutional amendment and implementing term limits for constitutional judges. He also halted state funding for pro-Orbán foundations like the MCC and reversed a government purchase of office buildings from companies linked to Orbán’s regime. Over 620 billion forints (approximately 1.7 billion euros) flowed from this transaction since 2023, while economists estimate several billion euros in EU funds were misappropriated during Orbán’s tenure. Magyar’s newly established Office of Misappropriation estimates losses could reach up to 160 billion euros. Whether Magyar’s government represents a genuine turning point in Hungarian history or merely a significant shift with limited institutional changes remains to be seen. The coming months will determine how effectively the new administration addresses the deep-seated challenges facing the country.

1 reports

Kurier logoKurierParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
100 days without Orbán: How Hungary has changed under Magyars

The article discusses the changes in Hungary after the unexpected victory of Péter Magyar’s Tisza Party in the April election, marking the end of Viktor Orbán’s 16-year rule. It highlights the disappearance of Orbán’s propaganda, including his warnings about migrants and security threats, which had been pervasive in daily life. The piece quotes a Hungarian citizen who struggled to believe this era has ended. The article notes that despite initial surprise at the election result, public approval for Magyar has remained high, with recent polls showing 67% of respondents believing Hungary is moving in the right direction. However, expectations for Magyar remain high, and the challenge lies in whether he can deliver on promises such as anti-corruption efforts, improved healthcare, and economic improvements. The article also mentions the appointment of a former High Court judge, András Baka, as president, who is an opponent of Orbán but not a loyalist to Magyar.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents the shift from Orbán to Magyar as a significant political change, it does not overtly favor either side. It reports on public sentiment, electoral outcomes, and expert opinions without clear ideological slant. The tone remains balanced, focusing on the challenges and hopes

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the political change in Hungary following the unexpected victory of Péter Magyar's Tisza Party in April. It references the removal of Viktor Orbán's propaganda, mentions specific figures like Manfred Weber and George Soros as his opponents, and describes the impact of Orbán's

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat celebratory of the political shift, using phrases like 'historischer Erdrutschsieg' (historic landslide victory) and comparing the election to 'der Fall des Eisernen Vorhangs' (the fall of the Iron Curtain). This suggests a positive bias towards the new government and a critical

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories