Ten years after the OEZ attack in Munich: 'We no longer believe in anything, not even the police'
On Wednesday, the tenth anniversary of the Munich Olympic Plaza (OEZ) terrorist attack occurred. The attack, which took place on July 22, 2016, resulted in the deaths of nine people, including Guiliano Kollmann, a 19-year-old with a migrant background. The perpetrator, David S., a 18-year-old German-Iranian, shot multiple victims before turning the gun on himself two and a half hours later. Initially, authorities did not classify the attack as terrorism, but three years later it was officially recognized as such. The incident sparked significant debate over police handling of right-wing extremism and racial tensions. Family members of the victims continue to seek answers and closure.
Ten years have passed since the Munich OEZ attack, yet the wounds remain fresh for many who were affected by the tragedy. On Wednesday, the tenth anniversary of the right-wing terrorist attack at the Munich Olympic Shopping Center, known locally as the OEZ, was marked with somber reflection. Family members of the victims continue to seek answers, while public trust in institutions has been shaken. The attack, which claimed the lives of nine young people, mostly of migrant origin or perceived to be migrants, left deep scars on the community and raised critical questions about how such violence is addressed. The attack took place on Friday evening, July 22, 2016. At around 5:51 p.m., the first shots rang out near a McDonald's restaurant adjacent to the shopping center. The perpetrator, David S., a 18-year-old German-Iranian, opened fire on six youths sitting together in the first floor of the McDonald's. Five of them died immediately. Outside, he shot two more pedestrians on the Hanauer Street before targeting another person at an electronics store. He then entered the OEZ itself, killing one more victim in the ground floor of the mall. By 6:04 p.m., police spotted him on the parking deck of the shopping center but lost sight of him again. As the city locked down, public transport was halted, buses returned to depots, and residents were urged to stay indoors for safety. David S. managed to escape the premises and hid in a bicycle shed in the neighborhood. When police located him, he shot himself dead at 8:23 p.m. The incident left 10 people dead, including the attacker, and shocked Germany. Despite the scale of the response, nearly 2,500 police officers deployed, the question lingers: How could one individual kill so many? In the aftermath, initial assessments labeled the attack as an isolated act of violence rather than a politically motivated act of terrorism. This interpretation persisted for over three years, during which time the perpetrator's background and motivations were largely overlooked. It wasn't until late 2019 that authorities officially classified the attack as an act of right-wing extremism. The delay in recognition sparked criticism, particularly among families of the victims, who felt their loss had been minimized. Gisela Kollmann, grandmother of Guiliano Kollmann, one of the victims, continues to visit her grandson's grave regularly. She describes him as a passionate football player and rapper, beloved within his family and community. His tombstone features a white angel holding an open book, with the inscription "We are not all rich, but we all bleed the same." These words reflect the final message Guiliano posted online just hours before his death. His story, along with those of the other victims, highlights the tragic consequences of prejudice and hatred. The attack drew widespread attention initially, but over time, public discourse shifted away from examining its roots. Researchers and advocacy groups argue that the failure to recognize the attack as an act of right-wing terrorism early on contributed to a broader underestimation of similar threats. The case has become emblematic of the challenges faced in identifying and responding to far-right violence in Germany. Today, as the tenth anniversary approaches, the families of the victims remain unresolved in their search for clarity. They emphasize the need for greater awareness and systemic change to prevent future tragedies. Their voices echo through the streets of Munich, reminding society that the fight against hate and discrimination is ongoing.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
On Wednesday, the tenth anniversary of the Munich Olympic Plaza (OEZ) terrorist attack occurred. The attack, which took place on July 22, 2016, resulted in the deaths of nine people, including Guiliano Kollmann, a 19-year-old with a migrant background. The perpetrator, David S., a 18-year-old German-Iranian, shot multiple victims before turning the gun on himself two and a half hours later. Initially, authorities did not classify the attack as terrorism, but three years later it was officially recognized as such. The incident sparked significant debate over police handling of right-wing extremism and racial tensions. Family members of the victims continue to seek answers and closure.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the systemic failure of authorities to recognize the attack as terrorism promptly, highlighting institutional racism and the underreporting of right-wing extremist acts. It frames the issue through the lens of marginalized communities and their lack of trust in institutions, a
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the details of the attack, including the date, location, and victim names. It references the primary source document by mentioning the victims' backgrounds and the nature of the attack as right-wing terrorism. However, it omits some key elements from the original text,
Why objectivity (65): The tone is empathetic and emotionally charged, focusing on the personal story of Guiliano Kollmann. While this is appropriate given the subject matter, it leans towards a narrative that emphasizes the human cost rather than presenting a balanced view of the broader social and political implications
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.