United StatesOwnership & classification
Founded: 1857
Ownership
The Atlantic was founded in 1857 in Boston. Since 2017 it has been majority-owned by Emerson Collective, the philanthropic and investment organization founded in 2011 by Laurene Powell Jobs, the billionaire widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. Emerson Collective bought a majority stake from businessman David Bradley, whose Atlantic Media had owned the title since 1999; Bradley retained a minority interest before fully exiting.
Funding
The Atlantic is financed commercially through paid digital subscriptions and a metered paywall, print circulation, advertising, and live events. Emerson Collective's deep-pocketed backing has subsidized expansion of the newsroom, and the magazine has reported reaching profitability on the strength of subscription growth.
Affiliation & stance
Editorially the magazine sits center-left and is known for long-form journalism and commentary, but it has no party, church or state control. Because it is privately and commercially owned by an independent ownership group with editorial independence from any political party or government, it is classified INDEPENDENT.
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Lean Left
- Measured from coverage
- Lean Leftbased on 102
68/100
Factual
60/100
Objective
137
Articles
137
reports
Top stories
Most covered right now
Kennedy Center eyes 'partial closure' after judge blocks full shutdown for renovation
Maher urges viewers to celebrate US 250th anniversary despite Trump: ‘He isn't America’
"New Form of Imperialism": Renowned U.N. Scientist on AI Boom's Huge Water, Carbon & Land Footprint
Heat waves mess with your brain. Scientists are trying to figure out why.
Another Top General Is Out at the Pentagon
How Trump’s Preliminary Deal with Iran Compares with His Rhetoric
Trump, Iran, and the logic of a new nuclear deal
J.D. Vance writes of journey to Catholicism in 'Communion,' his first book since 'Hillbilly Elegy'
Vance vs. Rubio: Iran Edition
Recent coverage
Israel and Lebanon sign framework agreement
Israel and Lebanon signed a framework agreement on Friday in Washington, mediated by the Trump administration, marking a diplomatic breakthrough. The agreement aims to end Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon and restore Lebanon's territorial integrity, though implementation remains uncertain due to Hezbollah's continued influence. The framework includes immediate steps like pilot projects where Israeli forces will withdraw from specific areas and Lebanese troops will deploy, with U.S. involvement to ensure these zones are free of Hezbollah. A senior Israeli official emphasized maintaining security until Hezbollah is disarmed, while a Hezbollah-affiliated leader criticized the agreement, warning of potential civil conflict. The agreement comes amid a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, with Israel conducting targeted strikes against perceived threats. U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, praised the agreement as a step toward peace, promising $100 million in aid for Lebanon.
Lead Iran negotiator tells allies Tehran will go to war again if U.S. does not fulfill commitments
Iran's parliament speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, warned allies China and Belarus that Iran would consider resuming hostilities if the U.S. fails to uphold commitments outlined in a recent memorandum of understanding. This statement came during meetings in Tehran with delegations from China and Belarus, who were present for the funeral of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Ghalibaf emphasized Iran's expectation of non-interference by the U.S. in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime route previously disrupted by conflict. He also discussed strengthening economic ties with China, highlighting its role as a major buyer of Iranian oil and a potential strategic ally. Recent tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after an attack on a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, leading to reciprocal military actions before both sides agreed to de-escalate and hold indirect talks in Doha.
Why Wall Street thinks US memory maker Micron is the next Nvidia
Micron Technology, a leading U.S.-based memory chip manufacturer, has seen a dramatic surge in its stock value due to increased demand for memory chips driven by the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. Micron's market capitalization temporarily surpassed those of Meta and Tesla, reaching nearly $1.27 trillion, although it later dropped slightly. This growth is attributed to a global shortage of high-bandwidth memory (HBM), essential for AI servers, which has persisted since 2026 and is expected to continue through 2027. Micron's recent financial performance includes a significant increase in revenue and profit, supported by long-term contracts with major players like Nvidia and Anthropic. However, challenges remain, as expanding production capacity is costly and time-intensive, and there is a risk of oversupply if demand decreases.
Team Trump squares up to rip Red and Blue critics of Iran peace deal
The Trump administration faces criticism from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress over a recent Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Iran aimed at ending hostilities and advancing broader negotiations. Critics argue the deal represents a significant concession to Iran, including provisions for the release of frozen Iranian assets and funding for Iran's reconstruction, which they compare unfavorably to the 2015 nuclear deal under former President Barack Obama. Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.) called the MOU 'the worst foreign policy blunder in decades,' while Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) accused the administration of betraying Israel. Democratic senators such as Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey have also criticized the deal, with Warren comparing it to the Obama-era agreement and Markey demanding congressional rejection. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has been vocal in opposing the deal, describing it as 'the art of surrender.' The 2015 law requiring congressional review of agreements involving Iran's nuclear program may provide a legislative avenue for challenging the MOU.
I Am A Woman Who Had To Compete Against A Man And It’s Anything But Fair Play
The article discusses the impact of Title IX on women's sports and raises concerns about the fairness of allowing biological males to compete in women's athletic categories. The author, a former Division I track and field athlete, describes her dedication to training and competing at a high level, only to face the challenge of competing against a biological male athlete who had previously competed in the men's category. She highlights the physiological differences between males and females, noting that males can run approximately 11% faster and accelerate 20% faster than females. These differences, she argues, were acknowledged when Title IX established separate athletic categories. The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining these distinctions to preserve opportunities for female athletes, such as scholarships, championships, and record-breaking achievements. It also references upcoming Supreme Court cases, Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., which could determine the future of women's sports. The author criticizes the argument that allowing biological males into women's competitions is an act of inclusion, arguing that it undermines the fairness and protections,
The Capital Is a Mess
The headline 'The Capital Is a Mess' from The Atlantic suggests a critical assessment of Washington, D.C., likely focusing on issues such as political dysfunction, gridlock, or poor governance. While the article does not provide specific content, the title implies a negative evaluation of the nation's capital, potentially highlighting challenges like partisan conflict, inefficiency, or corruption. Such topics fall under POLITICS due to their connection to government operations and public policy. Without further details, the exact focus and arguments remain unclear.
Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About ‘Universal Basic Capital’
The article discusses the growing interest in 'Universal Basic Capital' (UBC), a concept similar to Universal Basic Income (UBI) but focused on providing individuals with capital rather than income. It explores the reasons behind the sudden attention on UBC, including economic shifts, technological advancements, and debates over wealth distribution. The piece examines various proposals and arguments for and against UBC, highlighting discussions among economists, policymakers, and thought leaders. It also considers potential implementations and challenges associated with such a policy.
I Went to the Great American State Fair and I May Never Sleep Again
The article titled 'I Went to the Great American State Fair and I May Never Sleep Again' published by The Atlantic describes a personal experience at the Great American State Fair. The author recounts their attendance at the event, highlighting various aspects such as food, entertainment, and the overall atmosphere. They express a sense of nostalgia and connection to American traditions, while also reflecting on the sensory overload and exhaustion experienced during the visit. The piece serves as a nostalgic reflection rather than a critical analysis of the event itself.
Putin Is Slipping Into Delusion
The article titled 'Putin Is Slipping Into Delusion' by The Atlantic suggests that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be experiencing cognitive decline or delusional thinking. The piece explores concerns raised by some analysts and former colleagues about Putin’s behavior, including his apparent denial of past actions and inconsistent statements. While the article does not provide direct evidence of delusion, it highlights growing unease among some observers regarding his mental state and decision-making capabilities. The focus is on the implications of such concerns for Russia’s leadership and stability.
Socialist Congressional Candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier Hyped Communism, Marxism on Social Media
Darializa Avila Chevalier, a socialist congressional candidate in New York, promoted communist and Marxist ideas on her social media accounts, which have since been deleted. She ran against Democrat Rep. Adriano Espaillat and won the primary election. Her social media history includes posts advocating for the abolition of police and borders, referencing Karl Marx's works, criticizing public libraries for lacking Marxist literature, and retweeting content associated with communist figures like Assata Shakur and Joseph Stalin. She also criticized aspects of capitalism and supported policies such as the Green New Deal and universal healthcare. Following her victory, some Republican lawmakers claimed the Democratic Party has been taken over by the radical left.
The Vultures Arrived Before the Rescue Teams
This article discusses the arrival of vultures at a disaster site before rescue teams could reach the area. It highlights the unsettling image of scavengers arriving ahead of emergency responders, raising questions about the timing and coordination of relief efforts. The piece likely explores the implications of such occurrences, possibly touching on themes of nature's indifference to human crises or the challenges faced by rescue operations in reaching affected areas promptly. The narrative may include descriptions of the scene, the reactions of those involved, and any broader commentary on preparedness or response strategies.
A False Pretense of Judicial Modesty
The article titled 'A False Pretense of Judicial Modesty' by The Atlantic critiques the perception of judicial restraint in the U.S. legal system. It argues that some judges, particularly those appointed by conservative administrations, often claim to uphold constitutional principles while engaging in politically motivated rulings that undermine democratic norms. The piece highlights specific cases where judicial decisions were seen as overreaching, challenging the idea that courts should remain impartial and apolitical. The author suggests that this perceived hypocrisy undermines public trust in the judiciary and raises concerns about the separation of powers.
Hegseth, Rubio, and Caine Had an Auto-Deleting Signal Chat
The article reports that former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Senator Marco Rubio, and actor Ryan Caine participated in a private Signal chat that automatically deleted messages after they were read. The conversation reportedly included discussions about political strategy and personal matters. While the content of the chat was not disclosed, the fact that it was auto-deleting suggests an attempt to keep communications confidential. The incident has sparked discussions about privacy, transparency, and the role of private messaging platforms in political discourse.
Overlooked
Under-reported & one-sided
Nothing flagged as overlooked yet.