Tiktoker Mauti ändert sein Plädoyer, wird in einem Fall mit Rutos Kindern gegen Kaution freigelassen.

TikToker Hesbon Mauti Thomas, accused of posting a video containing remarks threatening President William Ruto’s children, was released on a Sh5,000 cash bail after changing his plea to not guilty. He appeared before Milimani Principal Magistrate Geoffrey Onsarigo on Friday, July 31, 2026, where the charge of offensive conduct conducive to breaches of the peace was read afresh to him. Mauti had initially pleaded guilty to the charge on Thursday but changed his plea following legal representation. The accused, who had previously admitted guilt, changed his stance after his lawyer, Cliff Ombeta, requested the court to reopen the matter and reread the charge. The court approved the request, leading Mauti to deny the allegations and plead not guilty. According to the charge sheet, Mauti is accused of uploading a video on June 25, 2026, via his TikTok account PROVIDENT@bonifaceaminga, which included statements prosecutors claim could incite unrest. The charge sheet states that Mauti modified content in the video to target President Ruto’s son George Ruto and his daughter, while also requesting that their parents pay Sh2 million. Mauti faces charges under Section 94(1) of the Penal Code, Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya, for offensive conduct that could lead to breaches of the peace. Following his denial of the charges, Mauti’s defense team highlighted his status as a young individual and a law student at Chuka University, whose tuition is funded by a church. They informed the court that Mauti is an orphan without parental support to aid in his release, requesting a lenient cash bail. His legal representatives emphasized the potential consequences of the charges and noted that the court should have the opportunity to reassess the situation given Mauti’s change in plea. The defense also stated that they had warned Mauti about the implications of his initial guilty plea and offered to continue representing him. The prosecution did not object to Mauti being released on bail. Magistrate Onsarigo accepted the Sh5,000 cash bail and instructed Mauti to provide one contact person. The case is scheduled to be addressed on August 18, 2026, for pre-trial instructions. Mauti’s legal team presented arguments focusing on his personal circumstances, including his academic pursuits and lack of familial support. They stressed the importance of considering these factors when determining bail conditions. The court’s decision reflects a balance between ensuring justice and acknowledging the defendant’s situation. The prosecution did not contest the bail amount, indicating a willingness to proceed with the case without immediate detention of the accused. This approach allows for continued legal proceedings while respecting the rights of the defendant. The upcoming hearing on August 18 will determine the next steps in the trial process. The incident underscores the intersection of social media usage and legal accountability, particularly concerning public figures. As the case progresses, it will be crucial to observe how the court navigates the complexities of digital communication and its impact on public order. The outcome of the trial may influence future interpretations of similar cases involving online threats and public figures. The matter will be mentioned on August 18, 2026, for pre-trial directions.