Die Staatsanwaltschaft prüft Anklagepunkte gegen Beamte, die in den Spionagescandal verwickelt sind.

Prosecutors in England are evaluating whether to press criminal charges against 12 former police officers linked to the spycops scandal, a long-standing controversy involving covert surveillance of political activists. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is currently reviewing a dossier of evidence suggesting that some of these officers may have engaged in misconduct while operating in undercover units. This comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the practices of police intelligence units that operated over several decades. The review follows an internal police investigation into Mark Kennedy, an undercover officer who spent six years infiltrating environmental and left-wing activist groups. Kennedy is central to the spycops scandal, having misled multiple women into believing he was not a police officer, leading to intimate relationships. While the exact number of affected individuals remains undisclosed, estimates suggest it could be in the double digits. The CPS is considering whether to pursue charges against the 12 officers under the offense of misconduct in public office. However, specific allegations against the officers have not yet been publicly detailed. If the CPS proceeds with prosecutions, it would mark the first instance in which officers involved in the undercover operations, spanning from 1968 through at least 2010, face criminal charges for actions not sanctioned by their superiors. The spycops scandal has exposed a wide array of misconduct among undercover officers, including deceptive practices involving women, false testimony in legal proceedings using fabricated identities, and the misuse of deceased children's identities. Kennedy, like many of his colleagues, assumed a false persona to blend in with activist circles. Between 2003 and 2009, he infiltrated groups such as Earth First! and Climate Camp, transforming from a conventional police officer into a long-haired, tattooed protester. His role was within the National Public Order Intelligence Unit, one of two units responsible for embedding officers in political organizations. Kennedy maintained a six-year relationship with a social justice advocate known as Lisa Jones. Jones discovered his true identity through her own research in 2010, triggering the broader spycops scandal. Her findings prompted a series of disclosures that eventually led to a comprehensive public inquiry into the activities and oversight of undercover officers. In response to these revelations, the police initiated several internal investigations into potential criminal behavior by individual officers. One such probe, named Operation Montrose, focused specifically on Kennedy and others. Launched in 2015 under the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), this operation sought to determine whether Kennedy had engaged in inappropriate sexual relationships while conducting undercover work. The NPCC confirmed that it submitted a file containing evidence related to Kennedy and 11 additional officers to the CPS. Details regarding the alleged misconduct by the other officers remain unclear. Meanwhile, Kennedy's relationship with another activist, Kate Wilson, became a focal point in legal discussions. In 2021, a tribunal ruled that the police had significantly violated Wilson's human rights. The tribunal found that senior officers overseeing Kennedy either knowingly ignored the relationship, deliberately turned a blind eye, or failed in their duty to investigate clear indicators of the connection. Surveillance records obtained during the case revealed that the police discreetly tracked and documented Wilson's personal life during her relationship with Kennedy. These records captured details of their shared living arrangements, visits to family homes, and travel plans. They also noted instances where the couple attended cultural events and educational institutions. Kennedy's legal representative has commented on the situation, though specifics of the defense's stance remain unpublicized. As prosecutors continue their assessment, the outcome could set a precedent for accountability within law enforcement agencies concerning historical undercover operations. The decision by the CPS will likely influence future handling of similar cases and potentially reshape policies around the conduct of undercover operatives.