ON
← Zurück zum Feed
"Nonsens", sagt Marcos bei Ausschlussrufen über eine langsame Flutkontrollesonde.
PH🏛️ Politikvor 5 Std.

"Nonsens", sagt Marcos bei Ausschlussrufen über eine langsame Flutkontrollesonde.

Präsident Ferdinand Marcos Jr. lehnte die Forderungen nach seiner Entlassung ab und nannte sie "Nonsens" und beschuldigte die Kritiker, "selektive Gerechtigkeit" zu praktizieren. Er argumentierte, dass seine Regierung die erste war, die Unregelmäßigkeiten in staatlich finanzierten Hochwasserschutzprojekten aufdeckte, die frühere Regierungen ignoriert hatten. Marcos betonte, dass Untersuchungen zum Hochwasserschutzskandal laufen und Probleme aufgedeckt haben, die über seine Amtszeit hinausgehen. Er stellte fest, dass selbst sein Vorgänger, Präsident Duterte, von Problemen bei Hochwasserschutzprojekten wusste, aber keine Maßnahmen ergriffen hat.

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has faced mounting pressure from critics who accuse him of failing to adequately address allegations of corruption surrounding flood control projects, despite his initial efforts to expose wrongdoing. During a press conference in Vancouver, Canada, on July 4, 2026, Marcos dismissed these criticisms as "nonsense," arguing that his administration is still actively pursuing accountability for those involved in the scandal. He emphasized that he is the only president who has taken significant steps to investigate irregularities in state-funded flood control initiatives, which he claims were previously ignored by previous administrations.

Marcos pointed out that the issues with flood control projects date back long before his presidency began in 2022. He stated that former President Rodrigo Duterte was aware of the "great problems" associated with these projects but took no action to address them. According to Marcos, it was only under his leadership that meaningful investigations were launched, leading to the creation of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) in September 2025. This commission was tasked with examining questionable aspects of flood control projects and has since made several notable contributions, including filing nine referrals to the Office of the Ombudsman, coordinating the referral of 66 individuals to the Department of Justice, and contributing to the freezing of 6,692 bank accounts valued at approximately P24.7 billion.

Despite these actions, Marcos admitted that the investigation is far from complete. He acknowledged that the government is "not done yet" in holding accountable all those involved in the flood control scandal. He expressed frustration over the complexity of the issue, describing it as a "deep-seated system of corruption" that requires not only structural reforms within the government and budget processes but also a shift in attitudes among those involved. Marcos stressed that the challenge lies in changing the mindset of individuals who believe that their actions are justified or that corruption is simply a normal part of governance.

The fallout from the flood control scandal has been extensive. Several high-profile figures have resigned or been forced to flee the country. Notably, Marcos’ cousin, Leyte Representative Martin Romualdez, stepped down as House speaker amid allegations of involvement in the scandal. Additionally, former appropriations committee chair Zaldy Co, who is also a contractor, fled the country nearly a year prior and remains a fugitive following court orders for his arrest. A handful of former and current senators have also been incarcerated over cases tied to the flood control projects.

While Marcos has vowed to hold corrupt actors accountable, his promises have not always materialized. In December 2025, he announced plans to jail corrupt officials before Christmas, but this pledge remained unfulfilled. When asked directly about critics calling for his resignation over perceived shortcomings in his anti-corruption campaign, Marcos deflected, stating that he is the only president who has taken initiative in exposing such practices. He argued that it is illogical for past leaders to claim responsibility for addressing the issue when they themselves did not take action.

As the investigation continues, the political landscape remains tense. Critics argue that Marcos’ efforts, while commendable, have not been sufficient to fully resolve the ongoing crisis. Meanwhile, Marcos maintains that his administration is committed to uncovering the truth and ensuring justice, even if it means confronting powerful individuals and systems that have long operated with impunity. The outcome of these developments will likely shape the future of Philippine governance and public trust in the executive branch.

Wie jede Seite berichtete

Dasselbe Ereignis, gruppiert nach der politischen Ausrichtung der berichtenden Medien.

Wie jede Seite berichtete

Unterstütze unabhängige, biasbewusste Nachrichten und schalte den Social-Puls, das Community-Voting und deinen persönlichen Für-dich-Feed frei.

Unterstützer werden

Weltweite Berichterstattung

Dasselbe Ereignis, wie es in anderen Ländern berichtet wurde.

Weltweite Berichterstattung

Unterstütze unabhängige, biasbewusste Nachrichten und schalte den Social-Puls, das Community-Voting und deinen persönlichen Für-dich-Feed frei.

Unterstützer werden

Faktencheck

Zentrale faktische Aussagen und wie viele Quellen sie bestätigen bzw. bestreiten.

Faktencheck

Unterstütze unabhängige, biasbewusste Nachrichten und schalte den Social-Puls, das Community-Voting und deinen persönlichen Für-dich-Feed frei.

Unterstützer werden

2 Berichte

Rappler logoRapplerUnabhängigMitteFaktentreue 90Objektivität 75vor 7 Std.
Marcos: Flood control corruption probe far from done

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. acknowledged during a press conference in Vancouver that his administration's investigation into flood control corruption is ongoing, despite significant progress. He admitted that the issue persists due to systemic problems that existed before his presidency, which began in 2022. Marcos highlighted that former President Rodrigo Duterte acknowledged the problem but took no action, leaving it to him to address. The probe has resulted in resignations and arrests of several officials, including cabinet members and lawmakers, over allegations of involvement in fraudulent or mismanaged flood control projects. Marcos emphasized the challenge of changing entrenched attitudes toward corruption among some politicians.

Tendenz-Einschätzung (Mitte): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue—corruption within the government—the framing remains balanced. Marcos is presented as both acknowledging the severity of the situation and expressing frustration with the persistence of corruption. There is no overt ideological slant, and the

Warum diese Bewertungen (Faktentreue 90 · Objektivität 75): Factuality is very high as it aligns with the details from the first article, reporting Marcos' acknowledgment that the probe is not complete. Objectivity is slightly better as it presents the information more neutrally, though it still emphasizes Marcos' actions without significant balance.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerUnabhängigRechtsFaktentreue 85Objektivität 70vor 5 Std.
"Nonsens", sagt Marcos bei Ausschlussrufen über eine langsame Flutkontrollesonde.

Präsident Ferdinand Marcos Jr. lehnte die Forderungen nach seiner Entlassung ab und nannte sie "Nonsens" und beschuldigte die Kritiker, "selektive Gerechtigkeit" zu praktizieren. Er argumentierte, dass seine Regierung die erste war, die Unregelmäßigkeiten in staatlich finanzierten Hochwasserschutzprojekten aufdeckte, die frühere Regierungen ignoriert hatten. Marcos betonte, dass Untersuchungen zum Hochwasserschutzskandal laufen und Probleme aufgedeckt haben, die über seine Amtszeit hinausgehen. Er stellte fest, dass selbst sein Vorgänger, Präsident Duterte, von Problemen bei Hochwasserschutzprojekten wusste, aber keine Maßnahmen ergriffen hat.

Tendenz-Einschätzung (Rechts): Der Artikel beschreibt die Verteidigung von Marcos gegen Anrufe zur Vertreibung als eine berechtigte Haltung gegen "selektive Gerechtigkeit" und betont seine Rolle bei der Aufdeckung von Korruption, während er Kritik herunterspielt.

Warum diese Bewertungen (Faktentreue 85 · Objektivität 70): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports Marcos' statements about the ongoing nature of the flood control probe and his defense against calls for his removal. Objectivity is lower due to the emotionally charged language like 'nonsense' and the focus on Marcos' perspective without providi

Halte die Nachrichten ehrlich.

ObjectiveNews ist leserfinanziert und werbefrei – wir zeigen dir den Bias, statt ihn zu verstecken. Unterstütze unabhängigen Journalismus für 5 €/Monat.

Unterstützer werden

Ähnliche Themen