CZThe article reports on a proposed constitutional amendment in Hungary submitted by Prime Minister Viktor Orban's party, Fidesz, which would end the term of President Tamás Sulyok immediately. The amendment includes provisions to limit parliamentary members' terms to 12 years and establish a new National Office for Enforcement and Protection of Property to investigate alleged misappropriation of assets during past electoral periods. Opposition leader Gergely Gulyás condemned the proposals as an end to constitutional democracy and the start of autocracy, arguing they undermine legal procedures and democratic processes. The ruling party, Tisza, won a decisive victory in April parliamentary elections, ending sixteen years of Orbán's leadership.
Tendenz-Einschätzung (Rechts): The article frames the constitutional changes as necessary reforms to 'free Hungary from a system that has held the state in captivity,' using strong language that portrays the current president and judicial system as corrupt. It emphasizes the ruling party's mandate and the opposition's accusations
Warum diese Bewertungen (Faktentreue 85 · Objektivität 65): The article accurately reports the proposed constitutional amendment and its main points, including the termination of Sulyok's presidency and changes to judicial terms. However, it presents the opposition's reaction as more emotionally charged, suggesting bias. The reference to 'impeachment' and th
