Der griechische Premierminister folgte in die Fußstapfen von Plenković: Er griff die EPPO heftig an, Brüssel hat ihn brutal abgeschossen

Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has escalated tensions with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), accusing the body of engaging in political games and demanding an apology. The dispute follows a series of allegations regarding misuse of agricultural funds, which have sparked public outrage and diplomatic friction. Mitsotakis, who has long been a prominent figure in European politics and a member of the European People's Party (EPP), has publicly called for an explanation from the head of the EPPO, Laia Koëszi, over what he describes as politically motivated investigations into his government. The conflict emerged after the EPPO launched a new investigation into alleged irregularities involving agricultural subsidies. According to reports, the office has issued charges against 22 individuals, including several current and former members of the ruling party. However, it has also dismissed seven cases against current officials and two against former ones. Mitsotakis has used these developments to accuse the EPPO of undermining democratic processes, claiming that its actions could influence election outcomes. His remarks echo similar criticisms previously leveled against Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who had also accused the EPPO of interfering in domestic affairs. Mitsotakis' comments were prompted by a question from a journalist following an interview that Laura Koëszi gave to Telegram’s Doris Kršul. In response, Mitsotakis emphasized that the EPPO should apologize to the Ministry of Culture and the government, arguing that the agency’s previous statements were based on incorrect information. He pointed to the case of the Faculty of Geodesy, stating that there was no connection between the ministry and the allegations. This incident highlights the growing sensitivity around the role of the EPPO in scrutinizing national governments. The situation reflects broader concerns about the independence and impartiality of the EPPO. While both Greece and Croatia have historically supported the institution, having played key roles in its establishment, the recent accusations suggest a shift in how some national leaders perceive its operations. In particular, Mitsotakis has framed the EPPO’s actions as part of a larger pattern of interference, drawing parallels to past controversies involving other EU institutions. In response to the controversy, Michael McGrath, the European Commission’s Commissioner for Justice, reiterated support for the EPPO during a briefing in Brussels. McGrath emphasized that the agency operates independently and adheres strictly to EU regulations. He noted that the Commission is planning a review of the EPPO’s legal framework, which would clarify whether the chief state prosecutor, Ivan Turudic, has the authority to decide whether a case should be handled by the European or national prosecutors. McGrath stressed the importance of cooperation with the EPPO, calling it a vital component of the Union’s rule of law efforts. Despite the official stance of support, the ongoing disputes underscore the challenges faced by EU bodies in maintaining trust among member states. As the debate continues, questions remain about the balance between accountability and sovereignty, particularly in matters of financial oversight. With both Greece and Croatia having contributed significantly to the creation of the EPPO, the current tensions highlight the complexities of ensuring transparency while respecting national interests. The outcome of this standoff will likely shape future interactions between EU institutions and member states, especially as the planned reforms take effect.