Jorge Capitanich, senatorial representative and former governor of Chaco, has launched sharp criticism against President Javier Milei and his close allies, including Leandro Zdero, regarding a government initiative that seeks to modify restrictions on foreign acquisition of rural land. In an interview with Perfil, Capitanich described the administration as one of the most disloyal to national interests he has encountered, accusing it of aligning too closely with external powers while neglecting provincial concerns. The proposed legislative change aims to loosen the current rules governing how foreigners can acquire land in Argentina. These regulations, established under Law 26.737 since 2011, include four key limitations: foreign ownership cannot exceed 15% of the country’s total surface area, no single nationality can hold more than 30% of that share, no more than 1,000 hectares can be sold in the core zone, and strategic areas near borders must remain protected. Capitanich argued these measures were essential to prevent sensitive regions from falling into the hands of illicit groups or foreign entities with potentially harmful agendas. He emphasized that the reform reflects a geopolitical strategy tied to access to minerals, energy, water and large territories, which he linked to U.S. influence. While acknowledging international agreements, he stressed that Argentina should not automatically align itself with foreign powers. “We cannot have an automatic alignment,” he stated, suggesting that such decisions require careful consideration rather than blind adherence. Capitanich’s critique extended beyond federal policy to the management of the province of Corrientes, where Zdero serves as governor. He criticized the economic model implemented during Zdero's tenure, claiming it led to the closure of businesses, job losses, and a significant decline in public services. According to him, over 1,000 small enterprises have gone bankrupt, approximately 8,000 formal private jobs have been lost, and around 30,000 direct and indirect employment positions have been affected. His assessment also included concerns over the deterioration of public health infrastructure, reduced teacher salaries, transportation crises, and rising provincial debt. Capitanich noted that promises of medical supplies, medications, and personnel did not materialize, leading to lower vaccination rates, the absence of a Plan Remediar, and insufficient resources to meet social demands. The decline in coverage of social programs has increased pressure on public hospitals, he added. In addition to economic and administrative issues, Capitanich raised questions about the handling of the disappearance of Axel González, though the specifics of this case were not elaborated upon in the available reports. His remarks reflect broader concerns about governance and accountability within the province. Meanwhile, other developments highlight contrasting narratives. For example, India recently announced plans to import Corrientes yerba mate and reduce tariffs, indicating growing interest in Argentine agricultural products despite political tensions. This underscores the complex interplay between domestic policies and international trade dynamics.
1 Berichte
PerfilUnabhängigProgressivFaktentreue 85Objektivität 60vor 5 Std. Capitanich: "Es gab noch nie eine Regierung, die so zwielichtig war wie die von Milei und seinen Adlattern, darunter Zdero".In einem Interview mit Profil beschuldigte Capitanich die nationale Regierung, "cipayo" und "vendepatria" zu sein, und erklärte, dass die Reform auf eine geopolitische Strategie zur Kontrolle der natürlichen Ressourcen und strategischen Zonen zurückgreift. Darüber hinaus kritisierte er die Verwaltung von Zdero in der Provinz Chaco und wies darauf hin, dass sein Wirtschaftsmodell den Bankrott von Tausenden von Unternehmen und den Verlust von Arbeitsplätzen verursacht hat. Capitanich betonte die Bedeutung der Aufrechterhaltung der Autonomie der Provinz vor nationalen Entscheidungen und warnte vor einem "automatischen Extrement" mit ausländischen Mächten.
Tendenz-Einschätzung (Progressiv): Der Artikel formuliert die Kritik an Milei und Zdero mit starker negativer Sprache ("cipayo", "vendepatria") und betont ihre Ausrichtung auf ausländische Interessen, was mit linken Kritiken der neoliberalen Politik und des ausländischen Einflusses übereinstimmt.
Warum Faktentreue (85): The article reports on statements made by Jorge Capitanich criticizing Javier Milei and Leandro Zdero regarding a proposed law to modify land purchase restrictions for foreigners. It provides background on the existing Law 26.737 from 2011 and outlines its four main limitations. The information alig
Warum Objektivität (60): The article presents Capitanich’s criticisms as direct quotes and frames them as strong accusations of 'cipayo' and 'vendepatria,' which carry emotionally charged terms. The tone leans toward criticism of Milei and Zdero, suggesting a partisan perspective rather than presenting both sides equally. T
★
Halte die Nachrichten ehrlich.
ObjectiveNews ist leserfinanziert und werbefrei – wir zeigen dir den Bias, statt ihn zu verstecken. Unterstütze unabhängigen Journalismus für 5 €/Monat.
Unterstützer werden