Kamerun: Präsident Paul Biya kritisiert wegen seiner wochenlangen Reise nach Genf

Cameroon’s president, Paul Biya, has drawn sharp criticism after spending several weeks in Geneva, Switzerland, according to reports. The 93-year-old leader departed the country on June 7 for what officials described as a “short, private stay” with his wife. His prolonged absence has raised questions among political figures and citizens alike, particularly given his long tenure in office and the lack of formal announcement regarding his whereabouts. Biya, who has held power since 1982, is widely regarded as the longest-serving head of state globally. His extended visit to Geneva marks another instance of his frequent absences from the country, which have become increasingly common in recent years. In late 2024, similar concerns emerged when Biya was away from Cameroon for nearly two months, prompting public scrutiny and calls for greater transparency. Political opposition leaders have voiced their discontent, arguing that Biya’s absence creates a “glaring institutional vacuum.” Mamadou Mota, a prominent opposition figure, has criticized the situation, suggesting that the president’s prolonged stays abroad undermine governance and public trust. Meanwhile, members of the ruling party have remained largely silent, with some choosing to avoid commenting publicly on the issue. Patricia Tomaino Ndam Njoya, president of the Cameroon Democratic Union (UDC), has called for an independent process to assess whether Biya is temporarily or permanently incapacitated. She emphasized the need for an impartial evaluation, stating that the current circumstances raise serious concerns about the stability of leadership. Her remarks reflect growing pressure within civil society for greater accountability and clarity regarding the president’s health and availability. The Cameroonian government has consistently maintained that Biya is in good health, dismissing rumors of illness or hospitalization. Communication Minister Jean-Pierre Nguetcheu recently addressed media inquiries, asserting that there is no evidence of the president being hospitalized during his stay in Geneva. However, these statements have not quelled public skepticism, especially following repeated instances of unexplained absences. Biya’s visits to Geneva are not new. Over the years, he has made multiple trips to the city, often under vague justifications. While some of these visits have included diplomatic engagements or family-related matters, others have sparked speculation about the nature of his activities abroad. Critics argue that such absences weaken the executive branch and hinder effective governance, particularly in a country where political tensions have been rising in recent years. As the debate continues, the focus remains on whether Biya’s health and ability to perform his duties are being adequately addressed. With no official confirmation of his condition or plans for his return, many remain concerned about the implications of his continued absence. The situation underscores broader challenges facing Cameroon’s political landscape, including the need for clearer communication and stronger institutional safeguards. For now, the president’s whereabouts remain a topic of ongoing discussion and scrutiny.