AISA und AIDSO verurteilen die Polizei-Lathi-Belastung von Studenten in Neu Delhi

On July 20, 2026, members of the All India Students’ Association (AISA) and the All India Democratic Students Organisation (AIDSO) expressed strong condemnation of the Delhi Police's use of force against student protesters during demonstrations in New Delhi. Around 1,500 participants joined a protest organized by AISA Karnataka at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, showing solidarity with the ongoing "Chalo Sansad or Parliament March." This march, aimed at pressuring the government to resign the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, had been publicly announced in advance. During the demonstration, protesters accused the Delhi Police of engaging in a brutal crackdown, including the use of lathi charges and tear gas, which resulted in numerous injuries among students and young activists. They specifically criticized the police for the alleged illegal abduction of Sonam Wangchuk, a prominent figure associated with the protests. The incident sparked outrage, with demonstrators arguing that the authorities' response reflected an authoritarian approach toward peaceful dissent. The protesters also raised broader concerns regarding the integrity of the education system, citing the recent NEET-2026 paper leak as part of a pattern of systemic failures. They claimed that over the years, there have been repeated instances of exam malpractice and irregularities, affecting millions of students who have suffered due to institutional negligence and corruption. In addition to condemning the police action, the protesters emphasized the importance of democratic rights, asserting that the denial of permission for the parliamentary march violated constitutional freedoms. AIDSO, led by its state treasurer Subhash B.J., reiterated that protesting is a fundamental right in a democracy and called for accountability from the authorities. Meanwhile, the Delhi Police has denied allegations made by the Chief Justice of India (CJP) regarding an assault on the wife of Sonam Wangchuk. According to official statements, the police maintain that all actions taken were within legal boundaries and necessary to ensure public order. However, these claims remain unverified, and the situation continues to draw attention from both local and national media. The protests in Bengaluru highlight growing tensions between student groups and law enforcement, particularly concerning the handling of demonstrations and the perceived erosion of civil liberties. As the debate over democratic expression and governmental authority intensifies, the role of student organizations in advocating for transparency and accountability becomes increasingly central to public discourse. Further developments are anticipated as both sides continue to engage in dialogue, with potential calls for legal action or policy reforms emerging from the ongoing unrest. The situation underscores the complex interplay between civic activism and state power, setting the stage for future confrontations and resolutions.